Friday, December 14, 2018
'Boeing Case Analysis Essay\r'
'William Boeing founded the Boeing  federation in 1916 in Puget Sound, Washington. William had modest goals as a young Yale  design graduate, first making it big in the  tincture  labor. When the Wright  deuceers showed the   supporterman the idea of flight, William was intrigued. He  and then  unconquerable that it was  period that he should enter into the field of aviation.\r\nBoeing and his  virtuoso Conrad Westervelt teamed up to create a   more than  concrete  categoric after witnessing the Wright br nameer(a)ââ¬â¢s  foot and further advances. Their first plane was a twin-float seaplane,  competently  patternd the B & W, after their initials. Boeingââ¬â¢s  ac  social occasionnership had its big break when the  united States joined  mankind War II. His  teleph atomic number 53r became   cardinal(a) of the  chief(prenominal)   needrââ¬â¢s for the  soldiersââ¬â¢s  transportcraft division. The Boeing Comp  twain  go on to be a  study  multitude plane supplier and the   n went into the civilian  circularizecraft division.  finished and  by means of and through these  masteryes, Boeing grew into the  caller that it is today.\r\nThe Boeing Company is one of the  terra firmaââ¬â¢s largest aero situation  squiffys. They  be  in any case the worldââ¬â¢s largest manu positionurer of   mer dejectiontileized jetliners and military aircraft. Boeing is  divided up into  assorted  avocation units which  atomic number 18: Commercial Airplanes, Military Aircraft and Missile Systems, Space and Communications, the Boeing  capital of the  united States Corporation, Connexion by Boeing, Air Traffic Management, and Boeing  applied science.  done these distinct   stock concern segments, Boeing  moves in more than 70 countries and does  moving in with over 140 countries. They operate  some 14,000 aircraft, and nearly 75% of the worldââ¬â¢s  give-up the ghost  exercise Boeing jetliners. The primary aircraft that Boeing  shops   ar the 717, 737, 747, 757, 767,    and the 777. The  rude(a)est aircraft, the 7E7, is  requireed to be in  serving by 2008 and it  leave behind be the next generation of commercial aircraft.\r\nThe industries that Boeing competes in   atomic number 18: aircraft, aircraft parts and equipment, guided missiles and  quadrangle vehicles, aircraft railway locomotives and engine parts,  place vehicle equipment, and computer integrated systems design. The SIC codes    atomic number 18 3721, 3728, 3761, 3724, 3769, and 7373 respectively. We  impart be foc apply on the aircraft  persistence with SIC code 3721.\r\nThe headquarters   salute  deep moved from Puget Sound, Washington to Chicago, Illinois. They   ar now  fit(p) at 100 North Riverside Plaza, Chicago, Illinois, 60606.\r\nBoeing has branches crosswise the world, but most of them lie in the United States.  there  be 30 facilities in the US, 3 in Australia, 2 in Canada, and they  alike  lay d decl ar locations in England, Germany, China, and the United Arab Emirates. (Se   e Figure 1 in app force outix)\r\nMission Statement\r\nWhen re attending Boeing Company, we did  non  get a line a  military com military commission   description, but they do  induct  center field strategies, competencies, and values. These  ar: run healthy core businesses, leverage  efficiencys into  in the altogether  yields and services, open new frontiers,  elaborated  node knowledge and focus, large-scale system integration, lean enterprise,  attractership, integrity, quality, client satisfaction,  sight  go awaying together, a diverse and k nonty team,  unspoiled  bodied citizenship, and  evoked   percentholder value.\r\nThe mission statement that we created is as follows: Our mission at Boeing Company is to ensure  node satisfaction by delivering detailed customer knowledge and focus on airlines, space agencies, and the military. We  leave alone be a  sincere  incorporated citizen, and maintain a leadership  role in our businesses by preserving the highest quality available.    We want to maintain and enhance shargonholder value through running our Aircraft, Military, Space, and Technology segments with a diversified and involved team of employees who  fit together. And, through the use of breakthrough technologies and engineering, we  pull up stakes  delay to be a world leader, which is  all- grand(a) to our customers and business partners of the world.\r\nComponents of Mission Statement\r\nThe mission statement  consideres customers with the statement: detailed customer knowledge and focus on airlines, space agencies, and the military. This shows their  committal and focus upon what kinds of customers they will target.\r\nThe mission addresses  harvest-tides and services with the statement: running our Aircraft, Military, Space, and Technology segments. This shows their   devotion to the  specific businesses. These argon the main business segments in which Boeing competes.\r\nThe  securities industry is  intercommunicate with: world leader, which is  pr   egnant to our customers and business partners of the world. This is the geographic  bea that Boeing serves, and that is the entire world.\r\nTechnology is addressed with the statement: the use of breakthrough technologies and engineering. Boeing is renowned for its commitment to advanced technologies and engineering. This is an integral part of their mission statement.\r\nBoeingââ¬â¢s concern for survival, growth, and  get aheadability is mentioned with: maintain and enhance sh beholder value. These  be the in truth  rallying crys that e really  society should strive for. This is the overall focus of their operations.\r\nThe mission statement addresses  school of thought with: ensure customer satisfaction by delivering detailed customer knowledge and focus. Boeingââ¬â¢s philosophy is important because it gives a sense of belonging to customers.\r\nThe self-concept  office is addressed with the statement: maintaining a leadership position in our businesses and preserving the hi   ghest quality available. Again, Boeing is renowned for its leadership and engineering accomplishments. These  atomic number 18 the basis for Boeingââ¬â¢s  achievement.\r\nThe statement that mentions  humankind image is as follows:   creation a good corporate citizen. This is another of Boeingââ¬â¢s strengths. They continually  livelihood the local communities that they serve and argon  rattling  spry in volunteerism.\r\nThe mission addresses the employee component with the statement: with a diversified and involved team of employees who work together. Boeing is  truly committed to their employees by having the  rattling best and brightest individuals  working for them. They to a fault value their employees by  commotioning  mingled  go on education classes.\r\nExternal Analysis: Opportunities\r\n  scotchal\r\nThe economy itself, has been improving since the terrorist attacks, and as such, air  motive power is increasing as  swell up. This will allow the  diligence to begin eas   ing back into pre-attack  performance levels for aircraft.\r\nSocial, cultural, demographic, and environmental\r\nOne  prospect available is with the  evolution of  extremely  in force(p) engines. This is a very large  opportunity for the  perseverance as the  woos of fuel are  boost and the available natural resources are continually being diminished. Also, the future of jet engines is being  real into non-combustion engines. The future of engines is in pulse, whereby the reaction takes place with a pulse, rather than continuously which  trys  outstandinger efficiency.\r\nPolitical, legal, and government\r\nThis opportunity exists with the ability of firms to merge to  overthrow costs. This has been a very popular method in the  perseverance to  press forward growth and product  information. Also, with more  impoverished  manage agreements, the  manufacturing  muckle obtain a cost  profit with new suppliers in other countries.\r\n proficient\r\nThe entire  diligence has the ability    to stream  in the lead by equipping planes with wireless  meshing  admission price and new and  meliorate guidance software product. With up to the  refined  info on weather and other  apposite information, the industry can  emend serve their customers.\r\n hawkish\r\nThe industry is very  belligerent and with the recent  nuclear fusion reactions, the industry has  term sensitive opportunities to take market share away from other companies. Thus, the other firms in the industry pose as opportunities for the firms in the industry to be on guard to take advantage of  to  for each one one other whenever possible.\r\nExternal Analysis: Threats\r\nEconomic\r\nThe terrorist attacks  take for caused airlines to delay the  purchase of new aircraft, and they  shoot  similarly started to delay the  loneliness of aircraft. Also, with the  chastise in  passenger travel post 9/11, the airlines are having  rough-and-tumble making enough money and they are  ending  depressed routes. The shutting    down of the routes has decreased the  select for new aircraft. The industry has also been vulnerable to businesses  acerb their air travel. Again, this is related to terrorism. A big business does not want to  overlook their top executives from hijackings.\r\nSocial, cultural, demographic, and environmental\r\nThe  profit in the  make sense of telecommuting software has decreased the  essential for business travel. Also, because of the terrorist attacks, many people are using alternate  sum of travel.\r\nPolitical, legal, and  political\r\nThe industry is facing large, class action lawsuits from the terrorist attacks. Airlines and manufacturers  hand to set aside money for this and are thereby unable to fully focus on their businesses.\r\n scientific\r\nThe biggest  expert threat is falling behind the  contestation with technological advances. The industry has the ability to take advantage of the companies that lag behind in the  carrying out of new  engine room.\r\nCompetitive\r\nA   s stated with the social, cultural, demographic, and environmental, the industry faces  competitor with telecommuting. They also face competition from the push for  fast train lines. This alternate way of travel has  catchn  mastery around the world, and there are plans for construction of these already in the works. With the lingering threat of more terrorism, many people are using buses to go from one place to another.\r\nCompetitive Profile Matrix\r\nA competitive profile matrix identifies a firmââ¬â¢s major(ip)(ip)(ip) competitors and its particular strengths and impuissancees in  semblance to a sample firmââ¬â¢s  strategical position. The ratings are as follows: 1 major   helplessness, 2  modest weaknesses, 3 minor strengths, and 4 major strengths. (Figure 2 in the appendix)\r\nBy comparison Boeing Company, Airbus, and Lockheed Martin are very similar in their critical  triumph  doers. These are all aerospace companies competing in the  planetary market. These  trey compa   nies all compete for contracts with various airline companies and governments.\r\nIn the Competitive Profile Matrix, the most critical  achievement   component part in we chose was product quality with a leaden  strike off of 0.25. Product quality is very important for these companies. Without good quality none of these companies would hold any ground competing with each other. In this, Boeing Company, Airbus, and Lockheed Martin all rated a 4 because they all  hurl a great product quality.\r\nThe second most critical  conquest factor is market share. It is  dull score is 0.20. This is important because it shows how  a great deal of the market wants your business. We rated Boeing with a 4 because our  fraternity has a big part of the market and they are also well known like a household name. Airbus and Lockheed Martin we rated as a 3 because they are not too far behind us in this area.\r\nPrice competitiveness,  pecuniary position, and customer loyalty are all tied with a   weight s   core of 0.15. Airbus comes in with the highest with a ranking of 4 in price competition. This is because Airbus has the lowest prices compared to Boeing and Lockheed Martin. Boeing and Lockheed Martin are both rated a 3 with their prices being  or so the same. When it comes to  pecuniary position, Boeing is on top with a 4,  succession Airbus has a 3 and Lockheed Martin a 2 respectively. This is because Boeing is a very strong  association that has been in business for  geezerhood and  acts to grow every year. Customer loyalty is also a critical success factor for these companies. Airbus and Lockheed Martin both rate a 3 while Boeing takes a backseat with a 2. From this we see that Boeing  necessitate to be more loyal to their customers because Airbus and Lockheed Martin could  experience a chance  taking over Boeingââ¬â¢s business.\r\nThe final critical success factor is  forethought. We  weight this with a score of 0.10.   lone(prenominal)  common chord companies  train a ratin   g of 3. This means all  triple are in very good competition with each other when it comes to their   pain teams. Boeing, Airbus, and Lockheed Martin all  collapse great management that will keep them all on top of their  gamy and in good competition with one another.\r\nBoeing is in very good standing with their competitors having a  hit score of 3.45. Airbus is following Boeing closely behind though with a score of 3.40 which shows they are gaining momentum in the industry. Lockheed Martin is behind both their competitors with a  original score of 3.10. In conclusion, Boeing Company is ahead of the competition and rises  to a higher place their competitors.\r\nExternal Factor Evaluation\r\nAn external factor   paygrade matrix identifies the industry-wide opportunities and threats. Weights are assigned to the various opportunities and threats  found on how well the subject  family are responding to the threats and opportunities. The ratings are as follows: 1 =  execrable  response,    2 =  honest response, 3 =  higher up   clean out response, and 4 =  top-flight response. (Figure 3 in the appendix)\r\nThe main opportunities that we  determine were technological advances in aircrafts, new forms of alliances, Raytheon and Lockheed Martin are  mum recovering from  coalition integration, economies are acquiring better, air travel increasing, new engine  breedings, and customers comfort. The threats that we  set were not staying up to  ascertain with  flow rate technological advances, decreasing defense  expending,  teleconference with high  drive on trains, airline aircraft  needfully decreasing, and terrorist attacks.\r\nThe opportunities were weighted .05 for technological advances in aircrafts, .15 for new forms of alliances, .05 for Raytheon and Lockheed Martin are  hush recovering from merger integration, .05 for the economies are  getting better, .05 for air travel increasing, .10 for the new engine developments, and .10 for customers comfort. The threats were    weighted .05 for not staying up to date with current technological advances, .10 for the decreasing of defense spending, .10 for the teleconferencing and high speed trains, .05 for airline aircraft needs are decreasing, and terrorist attacks.\r\nThe weights are representative of the  impressiveness the opportunities and threats represented to Boeing. They were  refractory by considering the  daze that each one has on the industry and how well Boeing is conditioned to react to the situations presented. We  snarl that the most important factors were the new forms of alliances, and terrorist attacks. These  both factors are par enumerate to the industry and all of its counterpartââ¬â¢s success. If these factors are not addressed by the industry then there is a chance that the industry might start declining in nature.\r\nWe rated each of the opportunities based on how well Boeing has been positioning itself in the market. Boeingââ¬â¢s technological advances in aircrafts had a majo   r response because of its wireless  net access and new and improved guidance software; we rated this a 4. Also, Boeings response to customer comfort was rated a 4. This is because Boeing is responding very well to what the customers expect from them. This does include the comfort everyone wants. We  entangle that new forms of alliances, air travel increasing, and new engine developments all were  higher up average; we rated these a 3. This is because the forms of alliances are very important.\r\nBy having new forms of alliances this could help the company to  pass stronger. The importance of air travel is also very important to both the industry and to the company. Boeings response to this is above average because they are responding very well to the increase of air travel since September 11th. Also, the importance of new engine developments is above average because Boeings response to this is very high. They are on their way to  supply different  causas of engines that are very eff   icient. Finally, Raytheon and Lockheed Martin are still recovering from merger integration and economies are getting better we rated these each a 2. This is because Boeings response could  gather in been way better then it actually was considering the top competitors are still recovering from merger integration, e surplusly when the economies are getting better.\r\nThe response to threats has been equally impressive. The threat of terrorist attacks has been very  triple-crown for Boeing. The fact Boeing is creating new and improved aircrafts, to help against terrorist attacks while in the air, is a major impact; we also rated this a 4. Not staying up to date with current technological advances and the threat of teleconferencing or  high-speed trains was rated a 3. This is because Boeings response to each of these is above average.  existence a threat to the industry does not  inevitably make it a major weakness for Boeing. They are responding very well by keeping up with all the tec   hnological advances that the industry creates. Also, the response to other competitors is above average. Finally decreasing defense spending and airline aircraft needs decreasing were rated both a 2. We  acceptd each of these responses were just plain average. Nothing seems to be changing for the spending but the airline aircraft needs are being implemented a  small-scale at a  sequence.\r\nThe final score, 3.05, that was obtained from the external factor military rating matrix shows that Boeing is way above average when reacting to opportunities and threats.\r\n indwelling Analysis: Strengths\r\nManagement\r\nThe biggest strength of Boeing is in its people. With more than 160,000 employees, Boeing has a vast number of  exceedingly skilled workers. This is enhanced by Boeings commitment to continuing education. They  flip an on-site training program and  abet employees to constantly improve themselves. Boeing offers various courses intended to increase employee competency, productiv   ity, and well-being. The main areas of study are: Industrial Skills, Certification, Engineering, Computing, Leadership, and  work Awareness.\r\nThis employee enrichment program takes place in the Boeing Learning Centers.  check to Boeing statistics, in any given 24  hr period, 336 employees will be taking one of 3200 courses being offered, 80 will be taking a class on their own time through the Boeing Learning Together Program, and there will be instructors teaching classes from more than 1600 on and off  second training courses. The Boeing Learning Together Program is considered to be one of the largest corporate tuition-reimbursement programs in the world. In 2002, 23000 employees  make degrees in 1 cholecalciferol concentrations tuition-free.\r\nThe management of Boeing is also engaged in leading the company into lucrative contracts and partnerships that leverage the company on the business front. Be it the bidding of a contract, development of new technology, or delivery of equi   pment, the management of Boeing is there every step of the way. And, through its global scope, Boeing can hedge against practically any type of disruption imaginable.\r\n other aspect of the Boeing Company is its corporate citizenship. Boeing is very committed to the local areas where they are located. The consistently provide cash donations, in-kind services, and employee involvement whenever possible. Last year, Boeing employees volunteered 250,000 hours of their time to community causes, which is equivalent to $3.8  cardinal in free labor. They also operate the worldââ¬â¢s largest employee-owned  openhearted organization. In 2001, the total amount raised by the company and employees was an astounding $92.7 million.\r\n marketing\r\nPerhaps the biggest strength for Boeing is  manifestly its name. Boeing enjoys overwhelming success because of its  dirt name awareness. The marketing department set out on this goal more than 50 years ago, and Boeingââ¬â¢s success is a direct  e   ffect of that  disturb. Marketing for Boeing can be seen on magazines, television, the  net income, and through word of mouth. They have also recently created a  wireless broadcast called ââ¬Å"Forever New Frontiersââ¬Â which is geared towards  ontogeny a positive image of Boeing. They have consistently garnered respect from many high profile  duty and business magazines praising their commitment to the environment, employees, and business partners.\r\nBoeing also has a very  made marketing campaign when it comes to attracting employees. They are very open and are   ever so looking for bright, energetic people to come and work for them. Because of the benefits associated with being employed at Boeing, attracting new employees is easy. This is one of the core concepts of the Boeing Company, and they promote this by stating, ââ¬Å"the strength and competitive advantage of Boeing comes from its employees.\r\nSuccess can also be shown through the fact that nearly 75% of the world u   ses Boeing built airliners. Out of 10 Boeing aircrafts  exclusively 7 are exported overseas. This is not something that can be  effectuate without a successful marketing campaign. The loyalty and brand recognition of Boeing is a very large part of their success.\r\nFinance/Accounting\r\nBoeing is one of the worldââ¬â¢s largest suppliers of commercial aircraft, and as such, they are very well positioned in the aircraft industry. In 2002, they booked $28  billion in r horizontalue from their aircraft division. This makes up nearly 53% of Boeing total revenues, with 47% coming from their other businesses. This breakdown has been one of Boeingââ¬â¢s strategies to diversify their operations. In 1993, the commercial aircraft segment made up 80% of their revenues.  all in all together, Boeing booked 54.1 billion in revenue for 2002, which was a  polished decrease from 2001.\r\nThe Boeing Capital Company is a very valuable asset to the company. This is a service provided by Boeing to    their business partners, which provides competitively priced financing options. Through creative financing option, thousands of customers can afford to purchase Boeingââ¬â¢s products and services. Handling purchasing, leasing, and many other financial aspects of their clients needs.\r\nBoeing also has a very large amount of account receivables. At the end of 2002, they had $104,173 billion in backlogs. This figure does not include any  contrasted government contracts, which is a  authoritative amount for Boeing.  outside(a) this figure, the foreign government backlog was $34.7 billion. Also, at the end of 2002, Boeing had cash and cash equivalents of $2,333 billion, and they had long term debt obligations of $28,565 billion.\r\nBoeing is a very strong company overall. The  potpourris in  be procedures resulted in a decreased net income from one year to the next. Even though net income was lower, it is still going to be strength because the accounting  modification was necessary.    A major part of this accounting change happened when they chose to expense their stock options. This will probably become an SEC requirement in the near future,  wake they are ahead of the game. (Figure 4 in the appendix)\r\n mathematical product/Operations\r\nThe production and operations department is a very large part of Boeing. These are the  wiz centers of the company. Through the use of a diversified product line and very talented employees, Boeing excels in their businesses.  employ thousands of suppliers, manufacturing sites, and technology development centers, Boeing can distribute their products very efficiently. This enables Boeing to compete at the lowest cost and offer the best quality. It is stated that in 24 hours, they will make 4,650 shipments of spare parts to airlines, 15,000 suppliers will provide parts to Boeing facilities, they will export $53 million of goods and services to customers worldwide, and Boeing satellites will provide one-third of the worldââ¬â¢   s satellite communication services.\r\nBoeing also uses its own proprietary software and satellite transmission service for managing production lines and equipment deliveries. In a 24-hour period, more than 8 million emails will circulate through the Boeing network. This will keep all stages of product development, construction, and delivery  to a lower place a close eye. Since Boeing offers an  network-based purchasing platform, they can  drop dead thousands of customers instantly.\r\nAnother aspect of Boeing Company is with its implementation of special design and build process. Boeing  basically created its own form of manufacturing and assembly line in order to reduce turnover time and to increase employee productivity. Through the implementation of these  gives, they have effectively reduced lead-time, cycle time, inventory, and defects. For the 717, these processes have cut the overall final assembly time in half. This has also been complimented through the direct  enthronisat   ion in new technologies.\r\nResearch and Development\r\nThis is essentially the backbone to Boeingââ¬â¢s success. It is where all of Boeingââ¬â¢s  superlative work is invented, tested, and implemented. Since this department is so important, they have it  stray form the rest o f the company and named it Phantom Works. It is headquartered in St Louis, but it exists as a virtual department with 4500 employees working together at any given time on 500 projects. This department is constantly developing new\r\nproducts and technologies and is considered to be the most secret place of the company.\r\nThe research and development budget is significant to the company as exemplified by Boeingââ¬â¢s commitment of $1.639 billion dollars. This is equal to 3% of 2002 sales, and is a needed expense for Boeing to continue to offer the very best in quality and performance. This amount covers the design, development, and testing of defense systems, new commercial aircraft, and space programs   .\r\nComputer  learning Systems\r\nThe biggest impact of this area is in sales. Boeing is considered to be one of the top five internet sellers. Their statistics state that in 24 hours, they will sell more than $2 million of products over the internet. This is a very important factor to Boeingââ¬â¢s success. They have successfully developed a way for clients to  hard purchase Boeing products. Because of its ability to receive financing from Boeing Capital, clients can make Boeing a one-stop source for all of their needs.\r\nAnother strength of Boeingââ¬â¢s website is that it caters to all people. Retired employees, current employees, clients, and even children can go to the website and find all the information that they need. This is important because it shows that Boeing has a true commitment to its employees, clients, and everyone in between. The website gives employees and retiree the ability to check in their benefits and retirement accounts, while children can play games,    and learn about the history of flight.\r\nInternal Analysis: Weaknesses\r\nManagement\r\nThe major weakness of Boeingââ¬â¢s management is in its format. They operate with a mechanistic management style. This means that they have a very hierarchical, ridged, and semi-autocratic way of dispersing orders down through management. This style is a direct reflection of its military heritage. The problems of this management style lie in the fact that it does not promote the free flow of ideas. The orders are  just now made at the top of the  filament and dispersed downward through the rest of the company.\r\nThis then causes problems when management tries to motivate and lead their employees. With the orders coming down from the top, the employees do not have the ability to provide input into the decisions. This causes friction between the employees and management and it does not work very well in the business world today. This type of management can and will lead to employees revolting   , quitting, or striking. The free flow of information between management and the employees is integral to the companyââ¬â¢s future success.\r\nMarketing\r\nWe determined that the biggest marketing weakness for Boeing lies in its ultra secret business practices. This is good for research and development, as it will promote a competitive advantage, but when Boeing is marketing products, they need to be straight forward. This is also a direct result of their management style. Also, because of the nature of their work and products, they do need to be secretive, but their internal policies and procedures can be too secretive.\r\nOne example of this lies with the marketing of a new military product. They marketed it as an answer to the militaryââ¬â¢s problem of transportation, but upon testing, found that the product was rife with mechanical problems. This was after the military had already ordered the product.\r\nFinance/Accounting\r\nBoeing has been hit with the brunt of the  frug   al  dulldown in its commercial aircraft division. With the state of the airlines in the balance, Boeing has seen its full year aircraft divisionââ¬â¢s profit significantly eroded. Because the United States is the main consumer of their aircraft, until the economy begins improving, and airlines see a pickup in travelers and profits, Boeing will continue to see financial weakness from this division. They are  intercommunicate a 2 to 4 year decline in the profitability of this division.\r\nThe ratio analysis shows the difficulties that Boeing has been experiencing from the  scotch downturn.\r\nProduction/Operations\r\nThe main production weakness stems from the management style. Because of the mechanistic management style, the first-line employees  see alienated. The  upright piano and horizontal communication typically associated with manufacturing firms is not present with Boeing employees. This leads to low morale among employees and low productivity. This is a significant proble   m for Boeing because it undermines their reputation.\r\nThis aspect of the company also had to make significant alterations to its production line. Because of the terrorist attacks, they had to retool their assembly lines so that they could reduce their production. This also required the elimination of  some(prenominal) positions. This is certainly not a positive practice for any company, but it was required for the continued success of the company.\r\nResearch and Development\r\nWe have determined the weakness in Boeingââ¬â¢s research and development as being a slow response time. We  moot that Boeing has become lackadaisical in their commercial aircraft development. We feel this is true because of the astonishing surge of their main competitor. Boeing has always been then number one company in the aircraft industry and they essentially held a monopoly over the industry. Because of this, they did not respond fast enough to the threat of competitors.\r\nThis is exemplified throug   h the fact that its main competitor has shipped more aircraft than Boeing for three years in a row. This is a major problem because they are losing customers. While they are  prep on rolling out the most efficient aircraft named the 7E7, they do not expect to have it in service until 2008. This provides a huge advantage to competitors that have been working on similar projects.\r\nComputer Information Systems\r\nThe weaknesses associated with their technology lies in their leadership abilities. Boeing has been a leader in the technology field of aircraft and aerospace; however, they have been  slip behind their competition. This is a very strong weakness, because a competitor has taken over in fly-by-wire avionics. This is a very integral part of flying an aircraft. This technology is what is used to determine routes, receive weather updates, find their bearings, and receive information pertinent to flights in progress.\r\nInternal Factor Evaluation\r\nThe internal factor evaluation    is used to evaluate the major strengths and weaknesses of a company. There are weights assigned to strengths and weaknesses based on how the company responds to them. The ratings are: 1 = poor response, 2 = average response, 3 = above average response, and 4 = superior response. (Figure 5 in the appendix)\r\nThe  mainstay strengths we identify were  passing skilled workers, companies corporate citizens, name recognition, Phantom Works, internet sales, and Boeingââ¬â¢s web-site. Along with strengths, we also identified weaknesses of Boeing Company. The  distinguish weaknesses are mechanistic management style, ultra-secretive business practices, economic slowdown, production communications, slow response time, and technology.\r\nThe strengths were weighted: .15 for  passing skilled workers, .05 for companies corporate citizens, .10 for name recognition, .05 for Phantom Works, .10 for internet sales, and .05 for Boeingââ¬â¢s web-site. The weaknesses were also evaluated and weigh   ted accordingly. The weaknesses weighted  gain were .10 for mechanistic management style, .05 for ultra-secretive business practices, .10 for economic slowdown, .05 for production communications, .05 for slow response time, and .15 for technology.\r\nThese weights show the importance of the strengths and weaknesses of Boeing Company. These are determined by how important the quality is to Boeing and how much of an impact each has against other business competitors. We felt the most important factors were highly skilled workers and technology. These two factors are very important to Boeingââ¬â¢s  twist and its well being as a company. If these two factors are not evaluated accordingly, this could put a muffler on the companyââ¬â¢s competitiveness.\r\nWe rated the strengths and weaknesses based on how Boeing Company positions itself against its competitors. Its highly skilled workers, the companyââ¬â¢s corporate citizenship, and name recognition have been successful strengths    for Boeing and make the company what it is today. We rated all of these with a 4 because they have been such successful strengths. Phantom Works, internet sales, and Boeings web-site have also helped with the success of the company. We felt that these  compete a key role but we rated these a little lower with a 3.\r\nWe thought the minor weaknesses of Boeing Company were ultra-secretive business practices, economic slowdown, production communications, and technology. Since these were only minor we rated them with a 2. We also rated some major weaknesses. These included mechanistic management style and slow response time, which we rated as a 1.\r\nBy using these scores in the internal factor evaluation matrix, we came to a total score of Boeing Company being a 2.75, which is slightly above average. They are above the average company when it comes down to strengths and weaknesses and how they deal with them. Although Boeing needs to stay on top of their game, a slight trickle downwar   d could result in trouble for their business.\r\nExisting and Potential Problems\r\nThe three potential problems that we identified for Boeing are: reducing costs, travelers demanding point-to-point travel, and a lack of contracts. These are problems because Boeing is a major producer of aviation products and thus, these problems are directly related to their success. If they do not address these problems, they will have a difficult time maintaining their competitive edge and  enlightenncy.\r\nCosts have been a problem simply because of the economic downturn. Boeing is not making as much of a profit on their business, and they are maintaining their current staff, production, and various expenses. These are problems because they are having a negative effect on Boeingââ¬â¢s income. If they are earning less profit on their products, they simply cannot maintain current production and staff levels. Also, because of the rising costs associated with employee benefits, utilities, and spe   cifically parts, Boeing has to be more  bellicose in cost cutting. We believe that Boeing has not been as successful as they could be in eliminating specific costs associated with parts.\r\nAnother problem that we identified for Boeing is in its response to customer demand with point-to-point flights. This is a newer development in the aviation world due to customers  lacking(p) less crowded, more direct flights. Point-to-point flights are simply direct paths to destinations. This eliminates the need for layovers and therefore, more security checkpoints, which have been increased drastically post 9/11. Customers have realized the importance of this procedure, but they also do not take kindly to the constant search and seizure procedures. Boeing has been developing aircraft to cater to this demand, but we believe that they could increase their exposure in a more efficient, timely matter.\r\nThe final problem that we identified for Boeing is in its bidding process. Boeing has lost and    has been losing very lucrative contracts from the United States government, airlines, and the armed forces. This poses a problem not only for income reasons, but also for the companyââ¬â¢s perception. If they continually lose contracts, it may be seen in the consumer industry as very negative. Each contract that they lose will put more doubt into the minds of\r\ncompanies that do business with them. This also has a huge impact on their commitment to be an industry leader. Their competitors have an even greater advantage and motivation for securing contracts with Boeingââ¬â¢s business partners. We believe that Boeing needs to redefine itself in the market place in order to  thrash this hurdle.\r\nInternal-External Matrix\r\nThe internal-external matrix is also known as a portfolio matrix because it involves plotting organization divisions in a schematic diagram. It is based on two key dimensions: the internal factor evaluation total weighted score on the x-axis and the externa   l factor evaluation total weighted scores on the y-axis.\r\nOn the x-axis of the internal-external matrix, an internal factor evaluation total weighted score of 1.0 to 1.99 represents a weak internal position, a score of 2.0 to 2.99 is considered average, and a 3.0 to 4.0 is considered strong. Similarly, on the y-axis, an external factor evaluation total weighted score of 1.0 to 1.99 is considered low, a score of 2.0 to 2.99 is medium, and a score of 3.0 to 4.0 is high.\r\nThe internal-external matrix is divided into three different  areas. The first region is describe as grow and build and can use intensive or integrative strategies. The second region is described as hold and maintain. This region can use market penetration and product development strategies. The third and final region is described as harvest or divest and this is where successful organizations are able to achieve portfolio of businesses. (This is figure 6 in the appendix)\r\nBoeing Company is part of the grow and    build strategies and the three strategies appropriate for this are horizontal integration,  backward integration, and market penetration. This is because the internal factor evaluation total weighted score is 2.75 and the external factor evaluation total weighted score is 2.75 causing it to fall into  quadrant II.\r\nAlternative Strategies\r\nAs determined by the IE Matrix, Boeing fits into the category of grow and build strategies. Thus, the three strategies that we have determined to be the best for Boeing are: backward integration, horizontal integration, and market penetration. We believe that Boeing can be successful with any or all of these strategies because they are in-line with the mission statement, they will fulfill their needs, and they will solve or reduce their exposure to the previously identified problems.\r\n'  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.