'Edward Snowden Essay\r'

'Does anybody alike(p) to be watched? At face value, nobody wants opposite citizenry to know their secrets and possibly use those secrets against them and certainly nobody want all their online discipline enter and their phone call wired. So wherefore is the internal Security Agency (NSA) c arefully taking voltaic pile e genuinelything we do with their giant yeottabyte-computers deep in the doh Desert? We know about this NSA scheme because of the leaker Edward Snowden who has been tardily feeded a one-year temporary initiation by the Russian giving medication. Why Russia granted the foundation and why Snowden is even there can be tied to three basic concepts of intercultural discourse, those of horticulture & external ampere; affectionate group, perspective, and cultural relativism. Edward Snowden was a â€Å"security avower at the NSA for the last four year, employed by several private contractors” (Economist 8840, 23).\r\nAfter announcing that he leaked the information that the NSA is using a program code-named PRISM, which collects an unknown criterion of e-mails, internet phone-calls, photos, videos, file transfer, and social-networking data from the technology giants such(prenominal) as Google and Facebook, Snowden boarded a plane flight to Hong Kong. harmonize to his followers, Snowden first fled into the arms of the Chinese and then the Russian because of the harsh treatments Private Bradley Manning, the leaker of military secrets to WikiLeaks, received. On imperious 1, Snowden â€Å"finally managed to break go off of his confinement at the transit zone of Moscow’s international airport” after he received his origination on Thursday. In theory, this event is deeply connected to three concepts of communication: culture & social group, perspective, and cultural relativism. The three concepts are all concepts that are based on an intercultural auspicate of view, because they all encounter our culture and the differences it has with former(a) cultures.\r\nOur culture is as clean-cut from other cultures as two different batch, they judge differently, and interpret and act in accordance simply to their own maxims and perspectives. The political relation’s perspective is very different from Snowden’s perspective, without their perspective being different, Snowden would non have done what he did, or the U.S. would not be chasing him around the globe. In addition, if the Russian giving medication did not recognize cultural relativism, Snowden could neer intake of getting an asylum from Russia. Our culture is a distinguish incidentor of why the Snowden affair even began. Because our culture can be considered quite a esurient security culture, we impose such rules that social communities and other culture may not approve.\r\nAfter â€Å" family line 11th 2001, George Bush tipped the balance also far from liberty toward security” and the balance stayed make ev er since (Economist 8847, 11). Due to the common the Statesn musical mode of life, people prefer a way of sp flopliness in which they receive the most amount of comfort. If you bye up to an American and ask him what he retrieves is most-valuable in life, one of his many answers will be the enjoyment of life. Snowden is no move oution, and thought that doing something that would potentially shut off the regimen from watching us and make himself sense of smell more comfortable when he use a phone is totally acceptable. While the government is thought about tracking down potential criminals, Snowden is thought process about why he is being watched and magnetic disk and wired every second of his life except when he is asleep. Snowden’s perspective is the same as the government in that they both want the silk hat for the people, but they differ widely on how that is to be achieved.\r\nSnowden believes that in order for the people to be free and genuinely happy, they m ust be given the right of doing what they want without certain constrains such as having their ring record collected when they are not surmise of crimes. On the other hand, the government believed that the more America knows, the better it is at defending itself. Due to the fact that Snowden had a different perspective from the government, he â€Å"pass over ‘thousands’ of classified documents” and showed Americans what the government is doing behind their backs and in front of their faces (Economist 8840, 23). Even though there has been questions regarding why Russia granted Snowden the asylum, it can be explained easily by the communication concept of cultural relativism. Cultural relativism recognizes that cultures exchange in how they think and behave as hearty as in what they believe and value. This clarified the point that Russians do not think as Americans and their government functions differently.\r\nIf Russia were to think like the American governme nt, it would have never looked for â€Å"trouble” with Snowden. Americans consider their own welfare in a higher place all other things; due to that, when the American government grants asylums to â€Å"criminals” desperately wanted elsewhere, the government rarely think about how it is affecting the other countries. Now, when the American government is put in this situation, it automatically assumes that all action done for Snowden’s benefit is for American’s detriment. On the Russian point of view, what they are doing may actually be a way to harbor the â€Å"Security-Prioritized Americans” from going to war with others for no good reason. It is posisble that Russia thinks that it is unconventional for a country to be a hypocrite, and that the American government should â€Å"learn a little lesson” from Russia’s asylum grant.\r\nEdward Snowden would not have done what he did without his culture, his social group, and his perspec tive. On the other hand, Russia would not grant an asylum if they did not recognize cultural relativism. oer all, the Snowden affair has been a controversy between the people and the government. The people have to apply all the communication concepts to use in order to make the approaching of America the scoop up possible, and the government has to make its best judgments based on the people’s decisions. Therefore, people should all learn be better communicators, thereof become better citizens, and help their country at such times of need as this.\r\n'