Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau Essay -- Philosophy Philosophi

Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed theories on human reputation and how work force modulate themselves. With the passing of time, semipolitical views on the philosophy of political sympathies gradually changed. Despite their differences, Hobbes and Rousseau, both became two of the most influential political theorists in the world. Their ideas and philosophies spread all over the world influencing the creation of some(prenominal) new political relations. These theorists all recognize that people develop a genially contract within their night club, but have differing views on what exactly the societal contract is and how it is established. By focal point of the differing versions of the social contract Hobbes and Rousseau agreed that certain freedoms had been surrendered for a societys protection and emphasizing the governments definite responsibilities to its citizens. Each political theorist agrees that before men cam e to govern themselves, they all liveed in a produce of nature. The differentiate of nature is the suss out men were in before political government came into existence, and what society would be if there was no government. In relation to this the two theorists raised as much praise as criticism for their famous masterpieces. Hobbes and Rousseau created a new idea of the adduce of nature. They did not believe government should be nonionic through the church, therefore abandoning the idea of the divine right theory, where power of the force came directly from God. Starting from a clean slate, with no organized church, Hobbes and Rousseau call for a construct on what to build society on. The foundation of society began with the original state of nature. Hobbes perception of the original state of nature is what would exist if there were no common power to execute and enforce the laws to enclose individuals. In this case, the laws of the jungle would prevail whole the fittest survive. Mans desires ar insatiable. Since resources are scarce, humankind is naturally competitive, inevitably creating jealousy and hatred, which eventually leads to war.The unbroken state of war is what Hobbes believes to be mans original state of nature. According to Hobbes, man cannot be trusted in the state of nature. state of war among men is consequent and nothing can be unjust. Notions of justice and outrage or right and wrong will not hav... ...ons on what kind of government should prevail within a society in parade for it to function properly. Each dismissed the divine right theory and mandatory to start from a clean slate. The two authors agree that before men came to govern themselves, they all existed in a state of nature, which lacked society and structure. In addition, the two political philosophers developed differing versions of the social contract. In Hobbes system, the people did unforesightful more than choose who would have absolute rule over them. This is a system that can only be derived from a place where no system exists at all. It is the lesser of two evils. People under this state have no participation in the decision making process, only to obey what is decided. While not perfect, the Rousseau state allows for the people under the state to participate in the decision making process. Rousseaus idea of government is more of a utopian idea and not really viable in the real world. Neither state, however, describes what a government or milkweed butterfly should expect from its citizens or members, but both agree on the touch that certain freedoms must be surrendered in order to improve the way of life for all humankind.